FireStream 9270 vs Quadro M1000M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FireStream 9270 and Quadro M1000M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FireStream 9270 stacks up against Quadro M1000M, check out specs charts below.
FireStream 9270
Quadro M1000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M1000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M1000M here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9270 | Quadro M1000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 40 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB/4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 300% more power consumption, than Quadro M1000M.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M1000M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- FireStream 9270 and Quadro M1000M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M1000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Quadro M1000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M1000M is 243 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro M1000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M1000M is 1400 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Battlefield 5 is 146% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FireStream 9270 and Quadro M1000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 210−220 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−105 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 140−150 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 77% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Dota 2 is 63% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Far Cry 5 is 162% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Fortnite is 117% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | − | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 91% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Minecraft is 26% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 158% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 120% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 160% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M1000M in World of Tanks is 52% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9270 | Quadro M1000M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Maxwell |
| Code name | RV770 | GM107 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 13 November 2008 | 2 October 2015 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 993 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1072 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 31.78 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 1,017 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 5000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Monero / XMR (CryptoNight) | 0.22 kh/s | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 140 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |