FireStream 9270 vs Quadro M2200
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FireStream 9270 and Quadro M2200, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FireStream 9270 stacks up against Quadro M2200, check out specs charts below.
FireStream 9270
Quadro M2200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M2200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M2200 here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9270 | Quadro M2200 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 55 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 190% more power consumption, than Quadro M2200.
- Quadro M2200 has 2 GB more memory, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M2200 - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Quadro M2200 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 56 MHz higher, than Quadro M2200.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro M2200 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M2200 is 1908 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 283% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Battlefield 5 is 261% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 240−250 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 210−220 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 130−140 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 180−190 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 130% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 51% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Dota 2 is 91% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Far Cry 5 is 275% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 130−140 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Fortnite is 203% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 30−33 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Forza Horizon 4 is 230% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | − | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 160% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Metro Exodus is 380% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Minecraft is 35% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 184% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 250% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 290% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M2200 in World of Tanks is 50% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9270 | Quadro M2200 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Maxwell |
| Code name | RV770 | N17P-Q3 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 13 November 2008 | 13 January 2017 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 694 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1038 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 1870 Million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.00 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 5508 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 88 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| 3D Stereo | + | |
| Check Price |