FireStream 9270 vs Quadro M500M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9270 and Quadro M500M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9270 and Quadro M500M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9270
Quadro M500M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M500M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M500M here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9270 | Quadro M500M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 433% more power consumption, than Quadro M500M.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M500M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- FireStream 9270 and Quadro M500M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M500M - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Quadro M500M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M500M is 279 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro M500M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M500M is 404 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 37% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Battlefield 5 is 62% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M500M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 11% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M500M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Dota 2 is 14% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Far Cry 5 is 120% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Fortnite is 12% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Forza Horizon 4 is 36% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Grand Theft Auto V is 21% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Minecraft is 5% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M500M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 41% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 66% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 50% more, than Quadro M500M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
| FireStream 9270 and Quadro M500M have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9270 | Quadro M500M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Maxwell |
| Code name | RV770 | GM108 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 13 November 2008 | 15 December 2015 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 17.98 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 4004 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.0 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |