FireStream 9270 vs Quadro P500
When choosing between FireStream 9270 and Quadro P500, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9270 and Quadro P500.
FireStream 9270
Quadro P500 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro P500 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro P500 here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9270 | Quadro P500 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 30 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | 3x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 433% more power consumption, than Quadro P500.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro P500 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FireStream 9270 and Quadro P500 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and Quadro P500 - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Quadro P500 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of Quadro P500 is 705 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro P500 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro P500 is 1412 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 42% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Battlefield 5 is 38% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 22% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Dota 2 is 14% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Far Cry 5 is 37% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Fortnite is 32% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Forza Horizon 4 is 40% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Grand Theft Auto V is 13% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Metro Exodus is 60% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Minecraft is 5% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 40% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 30−33 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 50% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro P500 in World of Tanks is 21% more, than FireStream 9270. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9270 | Quadro P500 | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Pascal |
Code name | RV770 | GP108 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 13 November 2008 | 14 November 2017 |
Pipelines | 800 | 256 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 1455 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1519 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | 1,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 21.25 |
Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 679.9 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 32.1 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12.1 |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.0.1 |
CUDA | 6.1 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |