FireStream 9270 vs Radeon HD 6950M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9270 and Radeon HD 6950M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9270 and Radeon HD 6950M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9270
Radeon HD 6950M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 6950M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 6950M here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9270 | Radeon HD 6950M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 220% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 6950M.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon HD 6950M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- FireStream 9270 and Radeon HD 6950M have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 6950M - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Radeon HD 6950M - with Terascale 2.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 170 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6950M.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 6950M - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 2700 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 6950M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 57% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Battlefield 5 is 46% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 25% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Dota 2 is 14% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Fortnite is 42% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Forza Horizon 4 is 40% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Grand Theft Auto V is 26% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Metro Exodus is 80% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Minecraft is 5% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 60% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 6950M in World of Tanks is 23% more, than FireStream 9270. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9270 | Radeon HD 6950M | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Terascale 2 |
Code name | RV770 | Blackcomb Pro |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 November 2008 | 6 January 2011 |
Pipelines | 800 | 960 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 580 MHz |
Transistor count | 956 million | 1,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 27.84 |
Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 1,113.6 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 900 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 115.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |