FireStream 9270 vs Radeon Pro 460
When choosing between FireStream 9270 and Radeon Pro 460, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9270 and Radeon Pro 460.
FireStream 9270
Radeon Pro 460 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro 460 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro 460 here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9270 | Radeon Pro 460 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 357% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 460.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon Pro 460 has 2 GB more memory, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro 460 - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
- Core clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 150 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 460 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro 460 is 1400 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Battlefield 5 is 184% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 91% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 41% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 70% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Far Cry 5 is 187% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 142% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Forza Horizon 4 is 180% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 117% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Metro Exodus is 260% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 25% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 153% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 190% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in World of Tanks is 47% more, than FireStream 9270. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9270 | Radeon Pro 460 | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Polaris |
Code name | RV770 | Polaris 11 / Baffin XT |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 13 November 2008 | 8 August 2016 |
Pipelines | 800 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 907 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 58.05 |
Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 1,858 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 81.28 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
FreeSync | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 227 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |