FireStream 9270 vs Radeon PRO WX 2100
When comparing FireStream 9270 and Radeon PRO WX 2100, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9270 and Radeon PRO WX 2100 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9270
Radeon PRO WX 2100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon PRO WX 2100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9270 | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 35 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 357% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FireStream 9270 and Radeon PRO WX 2100 have maximum RAM of 2 GB.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon PRO WX 2100 is 2400 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 42% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Battlefield 5 is 23% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Dota 2 is 8% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Far Cry 5 is 37% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Fortnite is 28% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 26% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | − | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 13% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Metro Exodus is 40% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Minecraft is 3% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 83% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 30% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 40% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in World of Tanks is 14% more, than FireStream 9270. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9270 | Radeon PRO WX 2100 | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Polaris |
Code name | RV770 | Polaris 12 |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Release date | 13 November 2008 | 21 March 2018 |
Pipelines | 800 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 1219 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | 2,200 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 39.01 |
Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 1,248 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 6000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 48 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_0) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
FreeSync | + | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |