FireStream 9270 vs Radeon Pro WX 4150
In this comparison between FireStream 9270 and Radeon Pro WX 4150 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9270 will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro WX 4150 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9270
Radeon Pro WX 4150 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon Pro WX 4150 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon Pro WX 4150 here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9270 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
| Check Price |
- Radeon Pro WX 4150 has 2 GB more memory, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and Radeon Pro WX 4150 - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 4150 - with Polaris.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 4150 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon Pro WX 4150 is 3400 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 71% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Battlefield 5 is 53% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FireStream 9270 and Radeon Pro WX 4150 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 70−75 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 33% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Dota 2 is 22% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Fortnite is 53% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 60% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 34% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Metro Exodus is 80% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Minecraft is 12% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 20−22 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 60% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 70% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4150 in World of Tanks is 26% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9270 | Radeon Pro WX 4150 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | Polaris |
| Code name | RV770 | Polaris 11 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 13 November 2008 | 1 March 2017 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 896 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | |
| Boost Clock | 1053 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.00 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 7000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | DirectX 12 |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |