FireStream 9270 vs Radeon R7 M275DX
In this comparison between FireStream 9270 and Radeon R7 M275DX you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9270 will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M275DX will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9270
Radeon R7 M275DX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R7 M275DX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R7 M275DX here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9270 | Radeon R7 M275DX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R7 M275DX - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Radeon R7 M275DX - with GCN.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M275DX - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 71% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in Battlefield 5 is 46% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FireStream 9270 and Radeon R7 M275DX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 160−170 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 30% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in Cyberpunk 2077 is 10% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in Dota 2 is 21% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in Far Cry 5 is 50% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in Fortnite is 46% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in Forza Horizon 4 is 46% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | − | 55−60 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in Grand Theft Auto V is 30% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in Metro Exodus is 80% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in Minecraft is 10% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 91% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 50% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 60% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 24−27 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M275DX in World of Tanks is 26% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9270 | Radeon R7 M275DX | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | GCN |
| Code name | RV770 | |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 13 November 2008 | 4 June 2014 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 896 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.00 | |
| Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | DirectX 12, Shader 5.0 |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| Vulkan | N/A | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |