FireStream 9270 vs Radeon R9 M275
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9270 and Radeon R9 M275. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9270 and Radeon R9 M275. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9270
Radeon R9 M275 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M275 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M275 here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9270 | Radeon R9 M275 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M275 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M275 has 2 GB more memory, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M275 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Radeon R9 M275 - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M275 is 175 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M275 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Radeon R9 M275 is 900 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 37% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Battlefield 5 is 62% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 12% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Dota 2 is 14% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Far Cry 5 is 120% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Fortnite is 12% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Forza Horizon 4 is 36% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Grand Theft Auto V is 20% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Minecraft is 5% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 41% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9270 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 20% more, than Radeon R9 M275. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 30−33 |
| FireStream 9270 and Radeon R9 M275 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9270 | Radeon R9 M275 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale | GCN |
| Code name | RV770 | Venus |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 13 November 2008 | 1 August 2014 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 956 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 37.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 1,184 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 122 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |