FireStream 9270 vs Radeon R9 M290X
When comparing FireStream 9270 and Radeon R9 M290X, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9270 and Radeon R9 M290X is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9270
Radeon R9 M290X is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon R9 M290X is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon R9 M290X here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9270 | Radeon R9 M290X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9270 has 60% more power consumption, than Radeon R9 M290X.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M290X uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon R9 M290X has 2 GB more memory, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is used in Desktops, and Radeon R9 M290X - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Radeon R9 M290X - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon R9 M290X is 100 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M290X - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 2400 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M290X.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 183% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Battlefield 5 is 153% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9270 and Radeon R9 M290X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 83% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Cyberpunk 2077 is 25% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Dota 2 is 63% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Far Cry 5 is 162% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Fortnite is 125% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Forza Horizon 4 is 146% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | − | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 4−5 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Metro Exodus is 220% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Minecraft is 25% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 175% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 180% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M290X in World of Tanks is 54% more, than FireStream 9270. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9270 | Radeon R9 M290X | |
Architecture | TeraScale | GCN |
Code name | RV770 | Neptune |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 13 November 2008 | 7 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 800 | 1280 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 850 MHz |
Boost Clock | 900 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | 2,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 72.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | 2,304 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 153.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | N/A | |
FreeSync | + | |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 x16 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 300 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 20 | |
Check Price |