FireStream 9270 vs Tesla C2075
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9270 and Tesla C2075. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9270 and Tesla C2075. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9270
Main Specs
FireStream 9270
Tesla C2075
Power consumption (TDP)
160 Watt
247 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
6 GB
Display Connectors
1x DVI
1x DVI
Check Price
Tesla C2075 has 54% more power consumption, than FireStream 9270.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Tesla C2075 has 4 GB more memory, than FireStream 9270.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Tesla C2075 - with Fermi 2.0.
Core clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 176 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Tesla C2075 - by 40 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 468 MHz higher, than Tesla C2075.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
5−6
16−18
ultra / 1080p
2−3
10−11
QHD / 1440p
2−3
4−5
low / 720p
14−16
35−40
medium / 1080p
7−8
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 200% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p
10−11
27−30
ultra / 1080p
8−9
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 720p
21−24
55−60
medium / 1080p
10−12
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Battlefield 5 is 169% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
50−55
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 15% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p
130−140
210−220
medium / 768p
100−110
190−200
ultra / 1080p
50−55
100−110
QHD / 1440p
27−30
65−70
4K / 2160p
12−14
30−35
high / 768p
75−80
150−160
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 88% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p
50−55
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 41% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p
80−85
110−120
medium / 768p
55−60
100−110
ultra / 1080p
30−35
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Dota 2 is 70% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p
7−8
21−24
ultra / 1080p
5−6
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
5−6
6−7
low / 720p
16−18
45−50
medium / 1080p
8−9
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Far Cry 5 is 187% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p
7−8
27−30
ultra / 1080p
0−1
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
14−16
low / 720p
55−60
110−120
medium / 1080p
18−20
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Fortnite is 142% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p
10−11
27−30
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
10−11
4K / 2160p
8−9
−
low / 720p
21−24
60−65
medium / 1080p
12−14
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Forza Horizon 4 is 173% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p
50−55
90−95
medium / 768p
−
80−85
high / 1080p
10−12
30−35
ultra / 1080p
5−6
14−16
QHD / 1440p
−
4−5
medium / 720p
45−50
−
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Grand Theft Auto V is 100% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p
3−4
10−12
ultra / 1080p
1−2
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
low / 720p
10−11
30−35
medium / 1080p
5−6
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Metro Exodus is 220% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p
90−95
110−120
ultra / 1080p
80−85
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Minecraft is 25% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p
6−7
−
ultra / 1080p
2−3
14−16
4K / 2160p
0−1
−
low / 720p
27−30
60−65
medium / 1080p
10−11
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 146% more, than FireStream 9270.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
9−10
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
10−11
30−35
medium / 1080p
9−10
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 150% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p
21−24
60−65
medium / 768p
14−16
35−40
high / 1080p
6−7
21−24
ultra / 1080p
4−5
12−14
4K / 2160p
3−4
7−8
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 180% more, than FireStream 9270.
low / 768p
75−80
90−95
medium / 768p
40−45
60−65
ultra / 1080p
18−20
35−40
high / 768p
30−35
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2075 in World of Tanks is 47% more, than FireStream 9270.
Full Specs
FireStream 9270
Tesla C2075
Architecture
TeraScale
Fermi 2.0
Code name
RV770
GF110
Type
Desktop
Workstation
Release date
13 November 2008
25 July 2011
Pipelines
800
448
Core clock speed
750 MHz
574 MHz
Transistor count
956 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
30.00
32.14
Floating-point performance
1,200.0 gflops
1,030.4 gflops
Length
248 mm
Memory bus width
256 Bit
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
3600 MHz
3132 MHz
Memory bandwidth
115.2 GB/s
150.3 GB/s
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
4.1
5.1
OpenGL
3.3
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
CUDA
2.0
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
94 Mh/s
Check Price
