FireStream 9270 vs Tesla T4
In this comparison between FireStream 9270 and Tesla T4 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9270 will be the best choice, for others Tesla T4 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9270
Tesla T4
Main Specs
FireStream 9270 | Tesla T4 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 160 Watt | 70 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 16 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
- FireStream 9270 has 128% more power consumption, than Tesla T4.
- FireStream 9270 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Tesla T4 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla T4 has 14 GB more memory, than FireStream 9270.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FireStream 9270 is build with TeraScale architecture, and Tesla T4 - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9270 is 165 MHz higher, than Tesla T4.
- FireStream 9270 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Tesla T4 - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Tesla T4 is 6400 MHz higher, than FireStream 9270.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 500% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Battlefield 5 is 423% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 100−110 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 12−14 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 75−80 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 160% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 20% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Dota 2 is 101% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Far Cry 5 is 487% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Fortnite is 328% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Forza Horizon 4 is 400% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
medium / 720p | 45−50 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Grand Theft Auto V is 260% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Metro Exodus is 620% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Minecraft is 46% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 253% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 10−11 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 420% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 21−24 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 520% more, than FireStream 9270. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla T4 in World of Tanks is 59% more, than FireStream 9270. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9270 | Tesla T4 | |
Architecture | TeraScale | Turing |
Code name | RV770 | TU104 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Release date | 13 November 2008 | 13 September 2018 |
Pipelines | 800 | 2560 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 585 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1590 MHz | |
Transistor count | 956 million | 13,600 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 30.00 | 254.4 |
Floating-point performance | 1,200.0 gflops | |
Length | 168 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3600 MHz | 10000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | 320.0 GB/s |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 12 Ultimate (12_1) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
CUDA | 7.5 | |