FirePro M5950 vs FireStream 9370
When comparing FirePro M5950 and FireStream 9370, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M5950 and FireStream 9370 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9370
FirePro M5950 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M5950 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 here:
Main Specs
| FirePro M5950 | FireStream 9370 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 542% more power consumption, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and FireStream 9370 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FireStream 9370 has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and FireStream 9370 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and FireStream 9370 - with TeraScale 2.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 100 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
- FirePro M5950 and FireStream 9370 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 3700 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 128% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 145% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro M5950 and FireStream 9370 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 190−200 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 160−170 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 66% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| FirePro M5950 and FireStream 9370 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−33 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 56% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 183% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 90% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | − |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 118% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 65−70 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 80% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 140% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 23% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 47% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 144% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
| low / 768p | 80−85 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 39% more, than FirePro M5950. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro M5950 | FireStream 9370 | |
| Architecture | Terascale 2 | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Whistler-XT | Cypress |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 13 April 2011 | 23 June 2010 |
| Pipelines | 480 | 1600 |
| Core clock speed | 725 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Transistor count | 716 million | 2,154 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.40 | 66.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 696.0 gflops | 2,640.0 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 900 MHz | 4600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 57 GB/s | 147.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| Bus support | n/a | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 67 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Form factor | MXM-A | |
| Check Price |