FirePro M6000 vs FireStream 9370
When comparing FirePro M6000 and FireStream 9370, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FirePro M6000 and FireStream 9370 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9370
FirePro M6000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro M6000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M6000 here:
Main Specs
FirePro M6000 | FireStream 9370 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 43 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 423% more power consumption, than FirePro M6000.
- FirePro M6000 is connected by MXM-B (3.0), and FireStream 9370 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FireStream 9370 has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro M6000.
- FirePro M6000 is used in Mobile workstations, and FireStream 9370 - in Desktops.
- FirePro M6000 is build with GCN architecture, and FireStream 9370 - with TeraScale 2.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 75 MHz higher, than FirePro M6000.
- FirePro M6000 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and FireStream 9370 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 100 MHz higher, than FirePro M6000.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 45% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 42% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FirePro M6000 and FireStream 9370 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 150−160 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 120−130 | 160−170 |
ultra / 1080p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 27% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 27% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 41% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 70−75 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 30−33 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 30% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 32% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 42% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 8% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
high / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 16−18 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
low / 768p | 30−35 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 37% more, than FirePro M6000. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 15% more, than FirePro M6000. |
Full Specs
FirePro M6000 | FireStream 9370 | |
Architecture | GCN | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Heathrow | Cypress |
Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 1 July 2012 | 23 June 2010 |
Pipelines | 640 | 1600 |
Core clock speed | 750 MHz | 825 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,500 million | 2,154 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 32.00 | 66.00 |
Floating-point performance | 1,024 gflops | 2,640.0 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4500 MHz | 4600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 72 GB/s | 147.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
Bus support | n/a | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Form factor | MXM-B | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FirePro M6000 vs Iris Pro Graphics 580
- FirePro M6000 vs Radeon R9 M385X
- FireStream 9370 vs Iris Pro Graphics 580
- FireStream 9370 vs Radeon R9 M385X
- FirePro M6000 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- FirePro M6000 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB