FirePro W4190M vs FireStream 9370
In this comparison between FirePro W4190M and FireStream 9370 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W4190M will be the best choice, for others FireStream 9370 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9370
FirePro W4190M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: FirePro W4190M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro W4190M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W4190M | FireStream 9370 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 8-pin |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W4190M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and FireStream 9370 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FireStream 9370 has 2 GB more memory, than FirePro W4190M.
- FirePro W4190M is used in Mobile workstations, and FireStream 9370 - in Desktops.
- FirePro W4190M is build with GCN architecture, and FireStream 9370 - with TeraScale 2.
- Both graphics cards have the same core clock speed.
- FirePro W4190M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and FireStream 9370 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 600 MHz higher, than FirePro W4190M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 170% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro W4190M and FireStream 9370 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 190−200 |
| medium / 768p | 95−100 | 160−170 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| QHD / 1440p | 24−27 | 45−50 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 70−75 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 69% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 53% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 216% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 100% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 20−22 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 180% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | − | 65−70 |
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| medium / 720p | 40−45 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 94% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 275% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
| high / 1080p | 65−70 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 20% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 166% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 1−2 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 175% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 53% more, than FirePro W4190M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W4190M | FireStream 9370 | |
| Architecture | GCN | TeraScale 2 |
| Code name | Mars XTX? | Cypress |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 12 November 2015 | 23 June 2010 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1600 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 825 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 950 million | 2,154 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 21.60 | 66.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 691.2 gflops | 2,640.0 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 4600 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 147.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_1) | 11.2 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| AppAcceleration | + | |
| Check Price |