FirePro W8100 vs FireStream 9370
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FirePro W8100 and FireStream 9370, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FirePro W8100 stacks up against FireStream 9370, check out specs charts below.
FirePro W8100
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
FireStream 9370
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Main Specs
FirePro W8100 | FireStream 9370 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 220 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | 1x 8-pin |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI | 1x DisplayPort |
- FireStream 9370 has 2% more power consumption, than FirePro W8100.
- FirePro W8100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and FireStream 9370 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- FirePro W8100 has 4 GB more memory, than FireStream 9370.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FirePro W8100 is build with GCN 2.0 architecture, and FireStream 9370 - with TeraScale 2.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 1 MHz higher, than FirePro W8100.
- FirePro W8100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and FireStream 9370 - by 40 nm process technology.
- FirePro W8100 is 12 mm longer, than FireStream 9370.
- Memory clock speed of FirePro W8100 is 400 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
low / 720p | 60−65 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 176% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Battlefield 5 is 173% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 250−260 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 220−230 | 160−170 |
ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 85−90 |
QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 70−75 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 210−220 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 63% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Dota 2 is 38% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
4K / 2160p | 14−16 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 80−85 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Far Cry 5 is 176% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
low / 720p | 180−190 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Fortnite is 128% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 60−65 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 162% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 130−140 | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 70−75 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 125% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
4K / 2160p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Metro Exodus is 210% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Minecraft is 23% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 10−12 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 130−140 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 181% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FirePro W8100 in World of Tanks is 11% more, than FireStream 9370. |
Full Specs
FirePro W8100 | FireStream 9370 | |
Architecture | GCN 2.0 | TeraScale 2 |
Code name | Hawaii | Cypress |
Type | Workstation | Desktop |
Release date | 23 June 2014 | 23 June 2010 |
Pipelines | 2560 | 1600 |
Core clock speed | 824 MHz | 825 MHz |
Transistor count | 6,200 million | 2,154 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 131.8 | 66.00 |
Floating-point performance | 4,219 gflops | 2,640.0 gflops |
Length | 279 mm | 267 mm |
Memory bus width | 512 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | 4600 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 320 GB/s | 147.2 GB/s |
DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 11.2 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 6.3 | 5.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 466 Mh/s | |
Form factor | full height / full length | |
StereoOutput3D | + | |
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | + | |
Similar compares
- FirePro W8100 vs Quadro P2000
- FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GTX 1650 mobile
- FireStream 9370 vs Quadro P2000
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 1650 mobile
- FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- FirePro W8100 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB