FireStream 9370 vs GeForce 825M
When comparing FireStream 9370 and GeForce 825M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9370 and GeForce 825M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9370
GeForce 825M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 825M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 825M here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | GeForce 825M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 33 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 581% more power consumption, than GeForce 825M.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce 825M uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FireStream 9370 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce 825M.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and GeForce 825M - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce 825M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 825M is 25 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce 825M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 2800 MHz higher, than GeForce 825M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 2−3 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1300% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce 825M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | − |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 410% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 5−6 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 17% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 166% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 295% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | − |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 305% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
low / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 45% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 270% more, than GeForce 825M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | − |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 176% more, than GeForce 825M. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | GeForce 825M | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Kepler |
Code name | Cypress | GK208 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 27 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 850 MHz |
Boost Clock | 941 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 915 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 30.11 |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 722.7 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |