FireStream 9370 vs GeForce 940MX
When comparing FireStream 9370 and GeForce 940MX, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9370 and GeForce 940MX is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9370
GeForce 940MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce 940MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce 940MX here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | GeForce 940MX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 23 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 878% more power consumption, than GeForce 940MX.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce 940MX uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- FireStream 9370 and GeForce 940MX have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and GeForce 940MX - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce 940MX - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce 940MX is 297 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce 940MX - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 600 MHz higher, than GeForce 940MX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 77% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 80% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9370 and GeForce 940MX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 42% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 38% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 88% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 53% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 84% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 55% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 71% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 13% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 60% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 69% more, than GeForce 940MX. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 25% more, than GeForce 940MX. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | GeForce 940MX | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Maxwell |
Code name | Cypress | N16S-GTR-B/S |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 10 March 2016 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 1122 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1242 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 23.83 |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 762.6 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 40.1 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1 |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 102 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
GPU Boost | 2.0 | |
GameWorks | + | |
Check Price |