FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GT 645M
When comparing FireStream 9370 and GeForce GT 645M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9370 and GeForce GT 645M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9370
GeForce GT 645M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 645M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 645M here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | GeForce GT 645M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 32 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3\GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 603% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 645M.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GT 645M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FireStream 9370 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 645M.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GT 645M - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce GT 645M - with Kepler.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GT 645M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 2800 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 645M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 280% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 314% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 645M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | − |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 93% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 80% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−11 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 375% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 180% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 287% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 131% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 650% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 20% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 64% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 325% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 8−9 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 7−8 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 400% more, than GeForce GT 645M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 57% more, than GeForce GT 645M. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | GeForce GT 645M | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Kepler |
Code name | Cypress | N13P-GS |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 22 March 2012 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 1,270 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 22.7 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 544.5 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
3D Blu-Ray | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 19 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- GeForce GT 645M vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- GeForce GT 645M vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- FireStream 9370 vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- FireStream 9370 vs Quadro CX
- GeForce GT 645M vs Radeon HD 8650G plus HD 8670M Dual Graphics
- GeForce GT 645M vs Quadro CX