FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GT 650M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FireStream 9370 and GeForce GT 650M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FireStream 9370 stacks up against GeForce GT 650M, check out specs charts below.
FireStream 9370
GeForce GT 650M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 650M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 650M here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | GeForce GT 650M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3\GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 400% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 650M.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GT 650M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FireStream 9370 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 650M.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GT 650M - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce GT 650M - with Kepler.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GT 650M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 2800 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 650M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 163% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 650M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 68% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 48% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 183% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 111% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 140% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 73% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 16% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 142% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 175% more, than GeForce GT 650M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 53% more, than GeForce GT 650M. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | GeForce GT 650M | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Kepler |
Code name | Cypress | N13E-GE |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 22 March 2012 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | |
Boost Clock | 900 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 1,270 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 652.8 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 1800 - 4000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 384 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
3D Blu-Ray | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 21 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- GeForce GT 650M vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- GeForce GT 650M vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- FireStream 9370 vs Radeon RX Vega 6
- FireStream 9370 vs FireStream 9250
- GeForce GT 650M vs Radeon RX Vega 6
- GeForce GT 650M vs FireStream 9250