FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GT 755M
When comparing FireStream 9370 and GeForce GT 755M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9370 and GeForce GT 755M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9370
GeForce GT 755M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 755M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 755M here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | GeForce GT 755M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 350% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 755M.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GT 755M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FireStream 9370 and GeForce GT 755M have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GT 755M - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce GT 755M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 755M is 155 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GT 755M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 755M is 800 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9370 and GeForce GT 755M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 40% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 33% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 54% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 43% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 71% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 36% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 71% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 10% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 45% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 57% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 25% more, than GeForce GT 755M. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | GeForce GT 755M | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Kepler |
Code name | Cypress | N14P- |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 25 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 980 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 1,270 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 31.36 |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 752.6 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 5400 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 86.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |