FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTS 160M
When choosing between FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTS 160M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTS 160M.
FireStream 9370
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTS 160M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTS 160M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | GeForce GTS 160M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 60 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 275% more power consumption, than GeForce GTS 160M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FireStream 9370 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 160M.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTS 160M - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce GTS 160M - with G9x.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 160M is 675 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTS 160M - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2700% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | − |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 410% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 231% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 295% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 305% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 36% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 550% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | − |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 176% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | GeForce GTS 160M | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | G9x |
Code name | Cypress | N10E-GS1 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 2 March 2009 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 64 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 505 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 19 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 192 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 51 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.1 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 64 | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | large | |
Gigaflops | 288 | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
Power management | 8.0 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- GeForce GTS 160M vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- GeForce GTS 160M vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- FireStream 9370 vs UHD Graphics 615
- FireStream 9370 vs Radeon HD 8730M
- GeForce GTS 160M vs UHD Graphics 615
- GeForce GTS 160M vs Radeon HD 8730M