FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTS 360M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTS 360M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTS 360M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9370
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTS 360M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTS 360M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 360M here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | GeForce GTS 360M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 38 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-II |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 492% more power consumption, than GeForce GTS 360M.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTS 360M uses MXM-II interface.
- FireStream 9370 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 360M.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTS 360M - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce GTS 360M - with GT2xx.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 360M is 611 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
- FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTS 360M are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2700% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 360M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | − |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 410% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 360M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 231% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 295% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 18−20 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 305% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 36% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 550% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | − |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
low / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 176% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | GeForce GTS 360M | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GT2xx |
Code name | Cypress | N11E-GS1 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 7 January 2010 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 1436 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 727 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 17.60 |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 275.71 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 57.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 2.1 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Gigaflops | 413 | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
Power management | 8.0 | |
Check Price |