FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q
In this comparison between FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9370 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9370
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 50 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 350% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is 210 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q - by 12 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q is 5400 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 176% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Battlefield 5 is 169% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 180−190 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 63% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Dota 2 is 38% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Far Cry 5 is 176% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 180−190 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Fortnite is 128% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 162% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 119% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Metro Exodus is 210% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Minecraft is 23% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 181% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q in World of Tanks is 11% more, than FireStream 9370. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Turing |
Code name | Cypress | N18P-G62 Max-Q |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 2 April 2020 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 1035 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 4,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 76.80 |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 10000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.5 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.140 |
CUDA | 7.5 | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- FireStream 9370 vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 960
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs Radeon Pro WX Vega M GL
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q vs GeForce GTX 960