FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 480M
In this comparison between FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 480M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9370 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 480M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9370
GeForce GTX 480M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 480M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 480M here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | GeForce GTX 480M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 100 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 125% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 480M.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 480M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- FireStream 9370 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 480M.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 480M - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce GTX 480M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 480M is 25 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
- FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 480M are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 3400 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 480M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 480M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 170−180 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 140−150 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 21% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 26% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 11% more, than GeForce GTX 480M. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | GeForce GTX 480M | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
Code name | Cypress | N11E-GTX-A3 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 25 May 2010 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 352 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 850 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 18.7 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 598.4 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |