FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 670MX
In this comparison between FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 670MX you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9370 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 670MX will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9370
GeForce GTX 670MX is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 670MX is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 670MX here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | GeForce GTX 670MX | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 200% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 670MX uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FireStream 9370 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 670MX - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce GTX 670MX - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 225 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 670MX - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 3200 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 670MX.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 45% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 670MX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 42% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 8% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 670MX. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | GeForce GTX 670MX | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Kepler |
Code name | Cypress | N13E-GR |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 1 October 2012 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 960 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 600 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 48.0 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 1,154 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 192 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 1400 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 67.2 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 960 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
HDCP | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Optimus | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- GeForce GTX 670MX vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- GeForce GTX 670MX vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce 9800M GTX SLI
- FireStream 9370 vs Iris Pro Graphics 580
- GeForce GTX 670MX vs GeForce 9800M GTX SLI
- GeForce GTX 670MX vs Iris Pro Graphics 580