FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 765M
When comparing FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 765M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 765M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9370
GeForce GTX 765M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 765M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 765M here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | GeForce GTX 765M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 200% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 765M.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 765M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- FireStream 9370 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 765M.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 765M - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce GTX 765M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 765M is 25 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 765M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 2600 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 765M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 28% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 765M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 41% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 22% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 33% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 18% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 4% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 29% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 13% more, than GeForce GTX 765M. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | GeForce GTX 765M | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Kepler |
Code name | Cypress | N14-GE |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 30 May 2013 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 768 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 850 MHz |
Boost Clock | 863 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 2,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 55.23 |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 1,326 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 64.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 API |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 768 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 24 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | large | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- GeForce GTX 765M vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- GeForce GTX 765M vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- FireStream 9370 vs Quadro 5000
- FireStream 9370 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4870 X2
- GeForce GTX 765M vs Quadro 5000
- GeForce GTX 765M vs Mobility Radeon HD 4870 X2