FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 850M
In this comparison between FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 850M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9370 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 850M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9370
GeForce GTX 850M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTX 850M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTX 850M here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9370 | GeForce GTX 850M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 400% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 850M.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 850M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 850M have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTX 850M - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce GTX 850M - with Maxwell.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 850M - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 850M have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 850M have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 850M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 190−200 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 160−170 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 0% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 850M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 850M have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Far Cry 5 is 5% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Fortnite is 2% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 850M have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Grand Theft Auto V is 2% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 850M have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 850M in Minecraft is 2% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 850M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 850M have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 850M have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| FireStream 9370 and GeForce GTX 850M have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9370 | GeForce GTX 850M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Cypress | N15P-GT |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 23 June 2010 | 12 March 2014 |
| Pipelines | 1600 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,154 million | 1,870 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 36.08 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 1,155 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 80.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 640 | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 2.0, PCI Express 3.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 153 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Standard memory configuration | DDR3 or GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto) | 1.8 Mh/s | |
| Check Price |