FireStream 9370 vs GeForce MX110
When choosing between FireStream 9370 and GeForce MX110, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9370 and GeForce MX110.
FireStream 9370
GeForce MX110 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX110 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX110 here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9370 | GeForce MX110 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5/DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 650% more power consumption, than GeForce MX110.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce MX110 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FireStream 9370 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce MX110.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and GeForce MX110 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce MX110 - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX110 is 140 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce MX110 - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 2800 MHz higher, than GeForce MX110.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 77% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 80% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FireStream 9370 and GeForce MX110 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 47% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 14% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 45% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 88% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 59% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 84% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 55% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | − | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 13% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 60% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 69% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 27% more, than GeForce MX110. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9370 | GeForce MX110 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Cypress | N16V-GMR1 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 23 June 2010 | 1 January 2018 |
| Pipelines | 1600 | 256 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 965 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 993 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,154 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 23.83 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 762.6 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 40.1 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |