FireStream 9370 vs GeForce MX250
When comparing FireStream 9370 and GeForce MX250, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9370 and GeForce MX250 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9370
GeForce MX250 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX250 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX250 here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | GeForce MX250 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 10 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x4 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 2150% more power consumption, than GeForce MX250.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce MX250 uses PCIe 3.0 x4 interface.
- FireStream 9370 and GeForce MX250 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and GeForce MX250 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce MX250 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX250 is 693 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce MX250 - by 14 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX250 is 2400 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
FireStream 9370 and GeForce MX250 have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
FireStream 9370 and GeForce MX250 have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9370 and GeForce MX250 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 190−200 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 160−170 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 0% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
FireStream 9370 and GeForce MX250 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
FireStream 9370 and GeForce MX250 have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Far Cry 5 is 5% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Fortnite is 2% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
FireStream 9370 and GeForce MX250 have the same average FPS in Forza Horizon 4. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Grand Theft Auto V is 2% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
FireStream 9370 and GeForce MX250 have the same average FPS in Metro Exodus. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−105 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Minecraft is 1% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
FireStream 9370 and GeForce MX250 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
FireStream 9370 and GeForce MX250 have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
FireStream 9370 and GeForce MX250 have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
FireStream 9370 and GeForce MX250 have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | GeForce MX250 | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Pascal |
Code name | Cypress | N17S-G2 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 20 February 2019 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 1518 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1582 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 1,800 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 24.91 |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 7000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 48.06 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2 |
CUDA | 6.1 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- GeForce MX250 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- GeForce MX250 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 850M
- FireStream 9370 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200
- GeForce MX250 vs GeForce GTX 850M
- GeForce MX250 vs Radeon Pro WX 3200