FireStream 9370 vs GeForce MX330
When choosing between FireStream 9370 and GeForce MX330, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9370 and GeForce MX330.
FireStream 9370
GeForce MX330 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce MX330 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce MX330 here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9370 | GeForce MX330 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 10 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 2150% more power consumption, than GeForce MX330.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce MX330 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FireStream 9370 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce MX330.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and GeForce MX330 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce MX330 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of GeForce MX330 is 706 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce MX330 - by 16 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce MX330 is 2400 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 7% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Battlefield 5 is 4% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FireStream 9370 and GeForce MX330 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 200−210 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 170−180 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 130−140 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| FireStream 9370 and GeForce MX330 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Dota 2 is 3% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Far Cry 5 is 5% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Fortnite is 2% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Forza Horizon 4 is 4% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Grand Theft Auto V is 8% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Minecraft is 5% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| FireStream 9370 and GeForce MX330 have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 6% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 9% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−105 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX330 in World of Tanks is 3% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9370 | GeForce MX330 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Pascal |
| Code name | Cypress | N17S-LP / N17S-G3 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 23 June 2010 | 20 February 2020 |
| Pipelines | 1600 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 1531 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1594 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,154 million | 1,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 16 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 38.26 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 7000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 48.06 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | 6.1 | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Check Price |