FireStream 9370 vs GRID K260Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9370 and GRID K260Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9370 and GRID K260Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9370
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GRID K260Q
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | GRID K260Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 225 Watt.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID K260Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FireStream 9370 has 2 GB more memory, than GRID K260Q.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GRID K260Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 80 MHz higher, than GRID K260Q.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID K260Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K260Q is 400 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 15% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Battlefield 5 is 17% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9370 and GRID K260Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 140−150 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 12% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Dota 2 is 8% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Far Cry 5 is 11% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Fortnite is 10% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 12% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 16% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Metro Exodus is 20% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Minecraft is 5% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 13% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 13% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K260Q in World of Tanks is 6% more, than FireStream 9370. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | GRID K260Q | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Kepler |
Code name | Cypress | GK104 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 28 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 745 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 95.36 |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |