FireStream 9370 vs GRID K280Q
When comparing FireStream 9370 and GRID K280Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9370 and GRID K280Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9370
GRID K280Q
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | GRID K280Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 225 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
- Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 225 Watt.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID K280Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FireStream 9370 and GRID K280Q have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- Both cards are used in Desktops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GRID K280Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 80 MHz higher, than GRID K280Q.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID K280Q - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GRID K280Q is 400 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 8% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 15% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9370 and GRID K280Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 180−190 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 150−160 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 3% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 3% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 6% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 4% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 14% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 4% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 11% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
FireStream 9370 and GRID K280Q have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 3% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
FireStream 9370 and GRID K280Q have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 10% more, than GRID K280Q. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 5% more, than GRID K280Q. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | GRID K280Q | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Kepler |
Code name | Cypress | GK104 |
Type | Desktop | Workstation |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 28 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 1536 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 745 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 3,540 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 95.36 |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 2,289 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 160.0 GB/s |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | 3.0 | |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- GRID K280Q vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- GRID K280Q vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- FireStream 9370 vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000
- FireStream 9370 vs Quadro K3100M
- GRID K280Q vs Radeon RX Vega 8 Ryzen 2000 3000
- GRID K280Q vs Quadro K3100M