FireStream 9370 vs GRID M60 8Q

In this comparison between FireStream 9370 and GRID M60 8Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9370 will be the best choice, for others GRID M60 8Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

FireStream 9370

GRID M60 8Q

Main Specs

	FireStream 9370	GRID M60 8Q
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	225 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	1x 8-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort	No outputs

Both graphics cards have the same power consumption of 225 Watt.
FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID M60 8Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
GRID M60 8Q has 4 GB more memory, than FireStream 9370.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GRID M60 8Q - with Maxwell 2.0.
Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 268 MHz higher, than GRID M60 8Q.
FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID M60 8Q - by 28 nm process technology.
Both graphics cards are the same length of 267 mm.
Memory clock speed of GRID M60 8Q is 412 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	12−14	20−22
ultra / 1080p	7−8	12−14
QHD / 1440p	2−3	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	27−30	35−40
medium / 1080p	16−18	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 53% more, than FireStream 9370.
high / 1080p	21−24	30−35
ultra / 1080p	18−20	27−30
QHD / 1440p	4−5	10−12
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 720p	45−50	65−70
medium / 1080p	21−24	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Battlefield 5 is 52% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p	190−200	230−240
medium / 768p	160−170	200−210
ultra / 1080p	85−90	110−120
QHD / 1440p	45−50	85−90
4K / 2160p	30−33	45−50
high / 768p	120−130	160−170
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 31% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	35−40	50−55
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Cyberpunk 2077 is 21% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p	100−110	120−130
medium / 768p	85−90	100−110
ultra / 1080p	55−60	75−80
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Dota 2 is 22% more, than FireStream 9370.
high / 1080p	14−16	24−27
ultra / 1080p	14−16	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	5−6	7−8
low / 720p	30−35	50−55
medium / 1080p	16−18	24−27
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Far Cry 5 is 52% more, than FireStream 9370.
high / 1080p	21−24	30−35
ultra / 1080p	16−18	24−27
QHD / 1440p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	85−90	120−130
medium / 1080p	45−50	70−75
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Fortnite is 42% more, than FireStream 9370.
high / 1080p	21−24	30−35
ultra / 1080p	16−18	24−27
QHD / 1440p	7−8	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	12−14
low / 720p	45−50	65−70
medium / 1080p	24−27	35−40
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Forza Horizon 4 is 45% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p	75−80	100−110
medium / 768p	65−70	90−95
high / 1080p	24−27	40−45
ultra / 1080p	10−11	16−18
QHD / 1440p	1−2	6−7
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 44% more, than FireStream 9370.
high / 1080p	8−9	12−14
ultra / 1080p	6−7	10−11
4K / 2160p	2−3	2−3
low / 720p	24−27	35−40
medium / 1080p	10−12	16−18
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Metro Exodus is 60% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p	100−110	120−130
ultra / 1080p	95−100	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	110−120
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Minecraft is 14% more, than FireStream 9370.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	14−16
low / 720p	50−55	70−75
medium / 1080p	21−24	18−20
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 16% more, than FireStream 9370.
high / 1080p	12−14	14−16
ultra / 1080p	9−10	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	24−27	35−40
medium / 1080p	14−16	20−22
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 40% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p	45−50	70−75
medium / 768p	27−30	45−50
high / 1080p	16−18	24−27
ultra / 1080p	9−10	14−16
4K / 2160p	7−8	8−9
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 50% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p	95−100	90−95
medium / 768p	55−60	60−65
ultra / 1080p	30−35	40−45
high / 768p	50−55	55−60
The average gaming FPS of GRID M60 8Q in World of Tanks is 5% more, than FireStream 9370.

Full Specs

	FireStream 9370	GRID M60 8Q
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Maxwell 2.0
Code name	Cypress	GM204
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	23 June 2010	30 August 2015
Pipelines	1600	2048
Core clock speed	825 MHz	557 MHz
Boost Clock		1178 MHz
Transistor count	2,154 million	5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	66.00	150.8
Floating-point performance	2,640.0 gflops	4,833 gflops
Length	267 mm	267 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	4600 MHz	5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth	147.2 GB/s	160.4 GB/s
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.0	6.4
OpenGL	4.4	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA		5.2

FireStream 9370 vs GRID M60 8Q

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares