FireStream 9370 vs HD Graphics 5000
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FireStream 9370 and HD Graphics 5000, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FireStream 9370 stacks up against HD Graphics 5000, check out specs charts below.
FireStream 9370
HD Graphics 5000 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 5000 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 5000 here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9370 | HD Graphics 5000 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 650% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 5000.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and HD Graphics 5000 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and HD Graphics 5000 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and HD Graphics 5000 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 625 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 5000.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and HD Graphics 5000 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 480% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 5000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 107% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 93% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 180% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 400% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 168% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 1600% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 27% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 733% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 966% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 76% more, than HD Graphics 5000. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9370 | HD Graphics 5000 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Gen. 7.5 Haswell |
| Code name | Cypress | Haswell GT3 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 23 June 2010 | 5 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 1600 | 40 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 200 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,154 million | 1,300 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 22 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 44.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.80 |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |