FireStream 9370 vs HD Graphics 515
When comparing FireStream 9370 and HD Graphics 515, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9370 and HD Graphics 515 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9370
HD Graphics 515 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 515 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 515 here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9370 | HD Graphics 515 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 1400% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 515.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and HD Graphics 515 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and HD Graphics 515 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and HD Graphics 515 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 525 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 515.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and HD Graphics 515 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 480% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of HD Graphics 515 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 107% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 93% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 500% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 180% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 400% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 35−40 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 168% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 1600% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | − | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 27% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 76% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 3−4 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 733% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 4−5 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 966% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 76% more, than HD Graphics 515. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9370 | HD Graphics 515 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Gen. 9 Skylake |
| Code name | Cypress | Skylake GT2 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 23 June 2010 | 1 September 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1600 | 24 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,154 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 22.80 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.97 |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |