FireStream 9370 vs HD Graphics 5300
In this comparison between FireStream 9370 and HD Graphics 5300 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9370 will be the best choice, for others HD Graphics 5300 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9370
HD Graphics 5300 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: HD Graphics 5300 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with HD Graphics 5300 here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9370 | HD Graphics 5300 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 1400% more power consumption, than HD Graphics 5300.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and HD Graphics 5300 uses PCIe 2.0 x1 interface.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and HD Graphics 5300 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and HD Graphics 5300 - with Gen. 8 Broadwell.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 725 MHz higher, than HD Graphics 5300.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and HD Graphics 5300 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FireStream 9370 and HD Graphics 5300 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 361% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 174% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | − |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 295% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 352% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 47% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 642% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | − |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 5−6 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 233% more, than HD Graphics 5300. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9370 | HD Graphics 5300 | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Gen. 8 Broadwell |
| Code name | Cypress | Broadwell GT2 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 23 June 2010 | 5 September 2014 |
| Pipelines | 1600 | 24 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 100 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,154 million | 1,300 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 21.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | + | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.80 |
| Quick Sync | + | |
| Check Price |