FireStream 9370 vs Iris Graphics 5100
When comparing FireStream 9370 and Iris Graphics 5100, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9370 and Iris Graphics 5100 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9370
Iris Graphics 5100 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 5100 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 5100 here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | Iris Graphics 5100 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 30 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | System Shared |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 650% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Graphics 5100 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and Iris Graphics 5100 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Iris Graphics 5100 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 625 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 5100.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Graphics 5100 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 170% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Iris Graphics 5100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 66% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 62% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 240% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 111% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 150% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 94% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 275% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 14% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 112% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 12−14 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 10−11 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 214% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 42% more, than Iris Graphics 5100. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | Iris Graphics 5100 | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Gen. 7.5 Haswell |
Code name | Cypress | Haswell GT3 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 5 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 40 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 200 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1200 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 1,300 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 22 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 48.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64/128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.80 |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- Iris Graphics 5100 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- Iris Graphics 5100 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- FireStream 9370 vs Quadro 3000M
- FireStream 9370 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4850
- Iris Graphics 5100 vs Quadro 3000M
- Iris Graphics 5100 vs Mobility Radeon HD 4850