FireStream 9370 vs Iris Graphics 550
When comparing FireStream 9370 and Iris Graphics 550, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9370 and Iris Graphics 550 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9370
Iris Graphics 550 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Graphics 550 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Graphics 550 here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | Iris Graphics 550 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | eDRAM |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 64 MB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Graphics 550.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Graphics 550 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Graphics 550 has 60 GB more memory, than FireStream 9370.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and Iris Graphics 550 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Iris Graphics 550 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 525 MHz higher, than Iris Graphics 550.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Graphics 550 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 42% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9370 and Iris Graphics 550 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 21% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 20% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 41% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 26% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 41% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 25% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 6% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 21% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 37% more, than Iris Graphics 550. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 13% more, than Iris Graphics 550. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | Iris Graphics 550 | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Gen. 9 Skylake |
Code name | Cypress | Skylake GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 1 September 2015 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 48 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 300 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1100 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 52.80 |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.97 |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- Iris Graphics 550 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- Iris Graphics 550 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 485M
- Iris Graphics 550 vs GeForce GTX 280M SLI
- Iris Graphics 550 vs GeForce GTX 485M