FireStream 9370 vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FireStream 9370 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FireStream 9370 stacks up against Iris Pro Graphics 5200, check out specs charts below.
FireStream 9370
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 5200 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | eDRAM |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 128 MB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 400% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 124 GB more memory, than FireStream 9370.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 625 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 33% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 42% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9370 and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 21% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 20% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 41% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 26% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 41% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 25% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 25% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 6% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 21% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 37% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 13% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | Iris Pro Graphics 5200 | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Gen. 7.5 Haswell |
Code name | Cypress | Haswell GT3e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 5 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 40 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 200 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1300 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 392 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 22 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 52.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 104.0 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.3 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.80 |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- FireStream 9370 vs Radeon RX 550X
- FireStream 9370 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Radeon RX 550X
- Iris Pro Graphics 5200 vs Maxwell GPU Surface Book