FireStream 9370 vs Iris Pro Graphics 580
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9370 and Iris Pro Graphics 580. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9370 and Iris Pro Graphics 580. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9370
Iris Pro Graphics 580 is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Iris Pro Graphics 580 is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Iris Pro Graphics 580 here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 15 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x1 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 64 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 1400% more power consumption, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Pro Graphics 580 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 has 60 GB more memory, than FireStream 9370.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and Iris Pro Graphics 580 - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 580 - with Gen. 9 Skylake.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 475 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 580.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 580 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 45% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 42% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9370 and Iris Pro Graphics 580 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 150−160 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 25% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 20% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 41% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 30% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 28% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 42% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 8% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 25% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 37% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 13% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 580. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | Iris Pro Graphics 580 | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Gen. 9 Skylake |
Code name | Cypress | Skylake GT4e |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 1 September 2015 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 72 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 350 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1050 MHz | |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 189 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 72.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | |
Shared memory | + | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.97 |
Quick Sync | + | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs GeForce GTX 285M SLI
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs GeForce GTX 460 768MB
- FireStream 9370 vs GeForce GTX 670MX
- FireStream 9370 vs FirePro M6000
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs GeForce GTX 670MX
- Iris Pro Graphics 580 vs FirePro M6000