FireStream 9370 vs Quadro 3000M
In this comparison between FireStream 9370 and Quadro 3000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9370 will be the best choice, for others Quadro 3000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9370
Quadro 3000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 3000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 3000M here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9370 | Quadro 3000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 75 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 200% more power consumption, than Quadro 3000M.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro 3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- FireStream 9370 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro 3000M.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and Quadro 3000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Quadro 3000M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 375 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
- FireStream 9370 and Quadro 3000M are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 3975 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 220% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 222% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 74% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 69% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 325% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 137% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 177% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 105% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 4−5 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 400% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 316% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 10−11 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 340% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−33 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 50% more, than Quadro 3000M. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9370 | Quadro 3000M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
| Code name | Cypress | Fermi |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 23 June 2010 | 22 February 2011 |
| Pipelines | 1600 | 240 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 450 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,154 million | 1,950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 18.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 432.0 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 625 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 28 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |