FireStream 9370 vs Quadro 4000M
When comparing FireStream 9370 and Quadro 4000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9370 and Quadro 4000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9370
Quadro 4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro 4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro 4000M here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9370 | Quadro 4000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-B (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 125% more power consumption, than Quadro 4000M.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro 4000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
- FireStream 9370 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro 4000M.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and Quadro 4000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Quadro 4000M - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 350 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000M.
- FireStream 9370 and Quadro 4000M are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 3400 MHz higher, than Quadro 4000M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 170% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FireStream 9370 and Quadro 4000M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 69% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 53% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 171% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 100% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 154% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 94% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 275% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 166% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 175% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 53% more, than Quadro 4000M. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9370 | Quadro 4000M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Fermi |
| Code name | Cypress | Fermi |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 23 June 2010 | 22 February 2011 |
| Pipelines | 1600 | 336 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 475 MHz |
| Transistor count | 2,154 million | 1,950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 26.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 638.4 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 1200 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | 2.1 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 82 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Check Price |