FireStream 9370 vs Quadro FX 3800

When comparing FireStream 9370 and Quadro FX 3800, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9370 and Quadro FX 3800 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

FireStream 9370

Quadro FX 3800

Main Specs

	FireStream 9370	Quadro FX 3800
Power consumption (TDP)	225 Watt	108 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Display Connectors	1x DisplayPort	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

FireStream 9370 has 108% more power consumption, than Quadro FX 3800.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
FireStream 9370 has 3 GB more memory, than Quadro FX 3800.
Both cards are used in Desktops.
FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Quadro FX 3800 - with Tesla 2.0.
Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 225 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro FX 3800 - by 55 nm process technology.
FireStream 9370 is 69 mm longer, than Quadro FX 3800.
Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 3000 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	12−14	0−1
ultra / 1080p	7−8	0−1
QHD / 1440p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	27−30	10−11
medium / 1080p	16−18	1−2
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 266% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	18−20	2−3
QHD / 1440p	4−5	0−1
low / 720p	45−50	9−10
medium / 1080p	21−24	2−3
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 625% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	45−50	50−55
high / 1080p	−	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9370.
low / 768p	190−200	100−110
medium / 768p	160−170	75−80
ultra / 1080p	85−90	30−35
QHD / 1440p	45−50	−
4K / 2160p	30−33	9−10
high / 768p	120−130	50−55
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 118% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	55−60	70−75
ultra / 1080p	35−40	12−14
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 6% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	100−110	65−70
medium / 768p	85−90	40−45
ultra / 1080p	55−60	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 102% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	14−16	1−2
ultra / 1080p	14−16	−
4K / 2160p	5−6	0−1
low / 720p	30−35	7−8
medium / 1080p	16−18	2−3
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 600% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	21−24	−
ultra / 1080p	16−18	−
QHD / 1440p	16−18	0−1
low / 720p	85−90	40−45
medium / 1080p	45−50	4−5
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 191% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	21−24	1−2
ultra / 1080p	16−18	−
QHD / 1440p	7−8	0−1
low / 720p	45−50	12−14
medium / 1080p	24−27	4−5
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 416% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	75−80	35−40
medium / 768p	65−70	−
high / 1080p	24−27	1−2
ultra / 1080p	10−11	−
QHD / 1440p	1−2	0−1
medium / 720p	−	30−35
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 168% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	8−9	0−1
ultra / 1080p	6−7	0−1
4K / 2160p	2−3	0−1
low / 720p	24−27	1−2
medium / 1080p	10−12	−
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 2400% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	100−110	85−90
high / 1080p	−	50−55
ultra / 1080p	95−100	−
medium / 1080p	100−110	−
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	21−24	14−16
ultra / 1080p	16−18	12−14
low / 720p	50−55	21−24
medium / 1080p	21−24	14−16
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 75% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
high / 1080p	12−14	−
ultra / 1080p	9−10	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	24−27	2−3
medium / 1080p	14−16	−
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 1150% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	45−50	4−5
medium / 768p	27−30	−
high / 1080p	16−18	2−3
ultra / 1080p	9−10	−
4K / 2160p	7−8	0−1
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 966% more, than Quadro FX 3800.
low / 768p	95−100	65−70
medium / 768p	55−60	30−35
ultra / 1080p	30−35	10−12
high / 768p	50−55	27−30
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 76% more, than Quadro FX 3800.

Full Specs

	FireStream 9370	Quadro FX 3800
Architecture	TeraScale 2	Tesla 2.0
Code name	Cypress	GT200B
Type	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	23 June 2010	30 March 2009
Pipelines	1600	192
Core clock speed	825 MHz	600 MHz
Transistor count	2,154 million	1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	55 nm
Texture fill rate	66.00	38.40
Floating-point performance	2,640.0 gflops	462.3 gflops
Length	267 mm	198 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	4600 MHz	1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth	147.2 GB/s	51.2 GB/s
DirectX	11.2 (11_0)	11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model	5.0	4.0
OpenGL	4.4	3.3
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
CUDA		1.3

FireStream 9370 vs Quadro FX 3800

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares