FireStream 9370 vs Quadro K4000M

In this comparison between FireStream 9370 and Quadro K4000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9370 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K4000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

Quadro K4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: Quadro K4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K4000M here:

Main Specs

  FireStream 9370 Quadro K4000M
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 100 Watt
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors 1x 8-pin
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 4 GB
Display Connectors 1x DisplayPort No outputs
  Check Price
  • FireStream 9370 has 125% more power consumption, than Quadro K4000M.
  • FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K4000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
  • FireStream 9370 and Quadro K4000M have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
  • FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K4000M - in Mobile workstations.
  • FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Quadro K4000M - with Kepler.
  • Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 225 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000M.
  • FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K4000M - by 28 nm process technology.
  • Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 1800 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000M.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 12−14 10−11
ultra / 1080p 7−8 6−7
QHD / 1440p 2−3 1−2
low / 720p 27−30 21−24
medium / 1080p 16−18 12−14
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 30% more, than Quadro K4000M.

Full Specs

  FireStream 9370 Quadro K4000M
Architecture TeraScale 2 Kepler
Code name Cypress N14E-Q3
Type Desktop Mobile workstation
Release date 23 June 2010 1 June 2012
Pipelines 1600 960
Core clock speed 825 MHz 600 MHz
Transistor count 2,154 million 3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 28 nm
Texture fill rate 66.00 48.08
Floating-point performance 2,640.0 gflops 1,154 gflops
Length 267 mm
Memory bus width 256 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 4600 MHz 2800 MHz
Memory bandwidth 147.2 GB/s 89.6 GB/s
Shared memory -
DirectX 11.2 (11_0) 12 (11_0)
Shader Model 5.0 5.1
OpenGL 4.4 4.6
OpenCL 1.2 1.2
Vulkan N/A 1.1.126
CUDA +
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 37 Mh/s
Laptop size large
Optimus +
  Check Price