FireStream 9370 vs Quadro K620M
In this comparison between FireStream 9370 and Quadro K620M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FireStream 9370 will be the best choice, for others Quadro K620M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FireStream 9370
Quadro K620M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro K620M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro K620M here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9370 | Quadro K620M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 30 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 650% more power consumption, than Quadro K620M.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K620M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- FireStream 9370 has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K620M.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and Quadro K620M - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Quadro K620M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro K620M is 204 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro K620M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 2600 MHz higher, than Quadro K620M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 170% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FireStream 9370 and Quadro K620M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 95−100 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 69% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 20−22 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 53% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 171% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 100% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 154% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 94% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 275% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 66% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 166% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 16−18 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 175% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 16−18 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 53% more, than Quadro K620M. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9370 | Quadro K620M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Cypress | GM108 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 23 June 2010 | 1 March 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1600 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 1029 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1124 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,154 million | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 17.98 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 863.2 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 92 Mh/s | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |