FireStream 9370 vs Quadro M4000M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between FireStream 9370 and Quadro M4000M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the FireStream 9370 stacks up against Quadro M4000M, check out specs charts below.
FireStream 9370
Quadro M4000M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Quadro M4000M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Quadro M4000M here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9370 | Quadro M4000M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 125% more power consumption, than Quadro M4000M.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro M4000M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FireStream 9370 and Quadro M4000M have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and Quadro M4000M - in Mobile workstations.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Quadro M4000M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 150 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Quadro M4000M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of Quadro M4000M is 412 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 176% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Battlefield 5 is 169% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 63% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Dota 2 is 38% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Far Cry 5 is 176% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Fortnite is 128% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Forza Horizon 4 is 162% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 119% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Metro Exodus is 210% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 130−140 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Minecraft is 23% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 53% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 140% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 181% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro M4000M in World of Tanks is 11% more, than FireStream 9370. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9370 | Quadro M4000M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Maxwell |
| Code name | Cypress | GM204 |
| Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
| Release date | 23 June 2010 | 2 October 2015 |
| Pipelines | 1600 | 1,280 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 975 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1013 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,154 million | 5,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 78.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 2,496 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 5012 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 160 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 251 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 3D Vision Pro | + | |
| Mosaic | + | |
| nView Display Management | + | |
| Check Price |