FireStream 9370 vs Radeon HD 7870M
When comparing FireStream 9370 and Radeon HD 7870M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between FireStream 9370 and Radeon HD 7870M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
FireStream 9370
Radeon HD 7870M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 7870M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 7870M here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9370 | Radeon HD 7870M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | 45 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 has 400% more power consumption, than Radeon HD 7870M.
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon HD 7870M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- FireStream 9370 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 7870M.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 7870M - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Radeon HD 7870M - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 25 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7870M.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 7870M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 600 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 7870M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 77% more, than Radeon HD 7870M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 80% more, than Radeon HD 7870M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
FireStream 9370 and Radeon HD 7870M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 190−200 | 130−140 |
medium / 768p | 160−170 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 30−33 |
4K / 2160p | 30−33 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 120−130 | 80−85 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 45% more, than Radeon HD 7870M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 14% more, than Radeon HD 7870M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 40% more, than Radeon HD 7870M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 88% more, than Radeon HD 7870M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
low / 720p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 59% more, than Radeon HD 7870M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 84% more, than Radeon HD 7870M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | 65−70 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 55% more, than Radeon HD 7870M. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 71% more, than Radeon HD 7870M. | ||
low / 768p | 100−110 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | − | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 100−110 | 90−95 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 13% more, than Radeon HD 7870M. | ||
high / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 40% more, than Radeon HD 7870M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 24−27 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 60% more, than Radeon HD 7870M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 69% more, than Radeon HD 7870M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 20−22 |
high / 768p | 50−55 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 25% more, than Radeon HD 7870M. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9370 | Radeon HD 7870M | |
Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN |
Code name | Cypress | Heathrow XT |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 23 June 2010 | 24 April 2012 |
Pipelines | 1600 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 800 MHz |
Transistor count | 2,154 million | 1,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 32.00 |
Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 1,024 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 4000 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
Laptop size | large | |
Check Price |