FireStream 9370 vs Radeon HD 8790M
When choosing between FireStream 9370 and Radeon HD 8790M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9370 and Radeon HD 8790M.
FireStream 9370
Radeon HD 8790M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: Radeon HD 8790M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with Radeon HD 8790M here:
Main Specs
| FireStream 9370 | Radeon HD 8790M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 225 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FireStream 9370 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon HD 8790M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- FireStream 9370 has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon HD 8790M.
- FireStream 9370 is used in Desktops, and Radeon HD 8790M - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9370 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and Radeon HD 8790M - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of Radeon HD 8790M is 25 MHz higher, than FireStream 9370.
- FireStream 9370 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 8790M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of FireStream 9370 is 100 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 8790M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 3−4 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 166% more, than Radeon HD 8790M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 4−5 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Battlefield 5 is 145% more, than Radeon HD 8790M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FireStream 9370 and Radeon HD 8790M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 190−200 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 160−170 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 45−50 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 30−33 | − |
| high / 768p | 120−130 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 61% more, than Radeon HD 8790M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 4% more, than Radeon HD 8790M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Dota 2 is 50% more, than Radeon HD 8790M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 5−6 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Far Cry 5 is 183% more, than Radeon HD 8790M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 85−90 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Fortnite is 80% more, than Radeon HD 8790M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 45−50 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Forza Horizon 4 is 133% more, than Radeon HD 8790M. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 65−70 | − |
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Grand Theft Auto V is 68% more, than Radeon HD 8790M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 8−9 | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Metro Exodus is 200% more, than Radeon HD 8790M. | ||
| low / 768p | 100−110 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 95−100 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 100−110 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Minecraft is 20% more, than Radeon HD 8790M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 50% more, than Radeon HD 8790M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 114% more, than Radeon HD 8790M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 20−22 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 12−14 |
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 144% more, than Radeon HD 8790M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 50−55 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9370 in World of Tanks is 42% more, than Radeon HD 8790M. | ||
Full Specs
| FireStream 9370 | Radeon HD 8790M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | GCN |
| Code name | Cypress | Mars XTX |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 23 June 2010 | 16 November 2012 |
| Pipelines | 1600 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 825 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 900 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 2,154 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 66.00 | 21.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,640.0 gflops | 691.2 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 147.2 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 80 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Check Price |